apparently, england's gone (considerably more) mad (than usual) for cricket in the two months since i left. even kim's made time to watch a few matches, despite the grand prix racing season not yet being over. and now there's definite reason for even fair-weather cricket fans to whoop it up: england just won The Ashes.
though i always enjoyed getting caught up in UK crazes, i'm not sure i could have kept up with this one. what i know about cricket fits into one clumsy compound sentence: as a cricket player, you must wear all white, you must beat australia, and you must whack a ball or something with a board or something.
seriously, can you decipher what this recap, from the guardian, is going on about?
"At one stage, England were wobbling at 127 for five and the Australians were circling, expecting the kill. Instead Pietersen took the fight to them - thrashing 38 runs off five overs after lunch in a display of belligerent, counter-attacking batting that will live long in the memory. He rode his luck - he was dropped three times - but fully deserved his maiden Test century, which included 15 fours and an Ashes-record seven sixes. Rightly, he was named man of the match."
someone "fully deserved his maiden test century"? what could that possibly mean?
* * * * * *
nothing's quite so inspirational as old-fashioned diet tips from steve martin.
* * * * * *
the chicago public library announced last week that the new one book one chicago is pride and prejudice.
i’m, you know, okay with this. it’s a classic novel, well-wrought and often delightful. [i mean: oh boy oh boy oh boy oh boy.]
when i first saw the 1995 mini-series*, i hadn’t yet read the book. i’m not sure i’d read any austen. but by the time colin firth’s darcy declared that “and to all this a fine woman must yet add something more substantial—in the improvement of her mind by extensive reading,” i was savoring the original text.
i’m not fully convinced that P&P is a spot-on selection for a chicago-specific, chicago-wide reading program. plenty of would-be readers will suspect that something written so long ago, by a woman, and about marriage, couldn’t be much more than over-stuffed fluff. i’m curious how CPL plans to promote it to people not in the “hey, bridget jones’s diary was loosely based on this!” crowd.**
mare daley uses this approach in supporting the book:
“In addition to being a great read, this One Book, One Chicago selection acknowledges the long-standing connection between Chicago and the United Kingdom. The Chicago Public Library was founded through a donation of books from England following the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. This year marks the 150th anniversary of the British Consulate General in Chicago. Pride and Prejudice honors this continuing friendship.”***
* all 300 minutes of which is being screened next month at sulzer regional library! who wants to be my date? be forewarned that i’ll want to arrive ten hours early to assure a decent seat and will probably repeatedly exclaim, “oh mr. bingley!”
** hey, it just occurred to me: maybe i should try to get a job with CPL!
*** i suppose i’m doing my part, as well, to nurture “the long-standing connection between chicago and the united kingdom.” though the british consulate general—along with the american embassy in london—can bite me.